This Christmas I'm making a collection of ornaments to give to friends and family. They are based on my blue bunny video and I am obsessed with making them. So cute!
I used Crayola Model Magic to make these. I dyed them with Crayola markers before modeling it into the bunnies. The ears are a little on the fragile end. I would not recommend making these for gifts for friends with little kids, as they want to play with the bunny. Instead, I would recommend making trees or snowmen.
Monday, December 15, 2008
Sunday, November 16, 2008
Lab 11 /
Which chatbots were the most convincing? What was done well? What done poorly? Within 10 years, will there be a program that can pass a five-minute Turing test? Is the Turing test a reasonable measure of whether a machine can think? More generally, if a program can behave in a way that is indistinguishable from human behavior, can it be said to think, and, if not, then what is thought?
As part of the requirements for Lab 11 of Informatics 102 students enrolled were to have a 5-minute chat with 3 chatbots and take a Turing test to decide it the 'bot' on the other end was a human or a machine. The three cyberbots were Eliza, Alice, and Jabberwacky. Eliza was programmed to model the speech patterns of a Rogerian psychologist. When talking with Eliza, circular logic becomes a pattern. It does not understand meaning of many words, which ends up creating sentences that make little sense. For example, because it is programmed to respond to the short response of "Yes/No" with "You are being positive/negative", when the user (in this example, me) replies with "I am not" (as a method of disagreeing) Eliza assumes "not" to be a state of mind (not as a method of disagreeing). I found Alice to be on the annoying end. Jabberwacky proved to be the most interesting of the three. The statements made were quirky, and a little more "human-like". For the most part, though, the statements seemed really confusing and not really fitting with the conversation.
The Turing test was most obviously a computer. I attempted speaking with the bot several times, and my internal compass never grasped a feeling of a human being on the other end. As stated in Shieber's article The Turing Test and the Loebner Prize, it was "realized early on that given the current state of the art, there was no chance that Turing's test, as originally defined, had the slightest chance of being passed by a computer program." So in order to give the computer a fighting chance at fooling any human performing a Turing Test, restrictions on the conversation were put into place. These limitations included two things: topic of the conversation and tenor (i.e. emotion).
I believe that if a cyberbot can achieve the intellectual conversation level of a human, it is the achievement of mankind that took it to that place. It is not 'thinking' until responses no longer need to be programmed and abstract connects can be made as swiftly as the human brain. I also believe that cyberbots have a place in our civilization. For example, as a method to supervise the Internet. I believe making the Internet safer for children and absent of visual stimuli that could be considered abusive (i.e. child porn) would be a valuable application of A.I. On this platform, the cyberbot could monitor chatrooms or help in catching online preditors.
As part of the requirements for Lab 11 of Informatics 102 students enrolled were to have a 5-minute chat with 3 chatbots and take a Turing test to decide it the 'bot' on the other end was a human or a machine. The three cyberbots were Eliza, Alice, and Jabberwacky. Eliza was programmed to model the speech patterns of a Rogerian psychologist. When talking with Eliza, circular logic becomes a pattern. It does not understand meaning of many words, which ends up creating sentences that make little sense. For example, because it is programmed to respond to the short response of "Yes/No" with "You are being positive/negative", when the user (in this example, me) replies with "I am not" (as a method of disagreeing) Eliza assumes "not" to be a state of mind (not as a method of disagreeing). I found Alice to be on the annoying end. Jabberwacky proved to be the most interesting of the three. The statements made were quirky, and a little more "human-like". For the most part, though, the statements seemed really confusing and not really fitting with the conversation.
The Turing test was most obviously a computer. I attempted speaking with the bot several times, and my internal compass never grasped a feeling of a human being on the other end. As stated in Shieber's article The Turing Test and the Loebner Prize, it was "realized early on that given the current state of the art, there was no chance that Turing's test, as originally defined, had the slightest chance of being passed by a computer program." So in order to give the computer a fighting chance at fooling any human performing a Turing Test, restrictions on the conversation were put into place. These limitations included two things: topic of the conversation and tenor (i.e. emotion).
I believe that if a cyberbot can achieve the intellectual conversation level of a human, it is the achievement of mankind that took it to that place. It is not 'thinking' until responses no longer need to be programmed and abstract connects can be made as swiftly as the human brain. I also believe that cyberbots have a place in our civilization. For example, as a method to supervise the Internet. I believe making the Internet safer for children and absent of visual stimuli that could be considered abusive (i.e. child porn) would be a valuable application of A.I. On this platform, the cyberbot could monitor chatrooms or help in catching online preditors.
Tuesday, November 4, 2008
Should these Judicial Candidates retain their office?
Sue E. Myerscough
Bio
Thomas Difanis (R), 1995, 2008
Put a stop Urbana City Council from meeting in private.
Harry E. Clem (R), 1979, 2008
Nothing really solid can be found beyond individual cases.
Arnold F. Blockman (D), 1996, 2008
Primarily tries family custody cases and states that with the current laws, custody is primary given to one parent. He's gotten a lot of static from fathers, where groups have even posted billboards against him. The following links will provide more insight into this matter.
Fatherless in America
Divorce and Custody excerpts:
"For those unhappy about his custody rulings, Blockman said the appellate court is probably the best indicator of if his actions are appropriate. Since taking the bench, Blockman said, 105 of his rulings have been appealed; 91 were affirmed outright; seven were partially affirmed. That means seven cases, or less than 7 percent, were overturned. Those numbers involve all kinds of cases, but for the last five years, he's done essentially nothing but family cases... Blockman said it's true he doesn't grant joint custody when only one parent wants it. But it's because the law precludes him, not because he has a prejudice against a particular parent."
News-Gazette: Judge receives criticism
Katherine McCarthy
Commenter on blog calls her "nice" and "reasonable"
A. G. Webber
Judging the Judges
More on the above
Bio
Thomas Difanis (R), 1995, 2008
Put a stop Urbana City Council from meeting in private.
Harry E. Clem (R), 1979, 2008
Nothing really solid can be found beyond individual cases.
Arnold F. Blockman (D), 1996, 2008
Primarily tries family custody cases and states that with the current laws, custody is primary given to one parent. He's gotten a lot of static from fathers, where groups have even posted billboards against him. The following links will provide more insight into this matter.
Fatherless in America
Divorce and Custody excerpts:
"For those unhappy about his custody rulings, Blockman said the appellate court is probably the best indicator of if his actions are appropriate. Since taking the bench, Blockman said, 105 of his rulings have been appealed; 91 were affirmed outright; seven were partially affirmed. That means seven cases, or less than 7 percent, were overturned. Those numbers involve all kinds of cases, but for the last five years, he's done essentially nothing but family cases... Blockman said it's true he doesn't grant joint custody when only one parent wants it. But it's because the law precludes him, not because he has a prejudice against a particular parent."
News-Gazette: Judge receives criticism
Katherine McCarthy
Commenter on blog calls her "nice" and "reasonable"
A. G. Webber
Judging the Judges
More on the above
Saturday, November 1, 2008
Blue Rabbit
Today the Girl that Got her Hair Cut Off morphed into a Blue Rabbit. This is practice video focusing on movement and color consistency.
With cheap cameras you will have really slow reaction to the color balance. I'm working with a XBox360Live. You really need to wait about 3-5 seconds once your hands have left the 'stage' for the camera to have enough time to adjust the coloring. This was an unpredicted piece of knowledge I get to share today. Can't wait to write it into a lesson plan!
Labels:
art education,
blue bunny,
cartoon style,
claymation,
video
Friday, October 31, 2008
First attempt at Claymation:
Girl Realizing her Hair got Cut Off
This is my first attempt at making a Claymation video with iStopMotion. Its a little out of focused and the environment isn't so well planned, but the short is fun.
Labels:
art education,
claymation,
stop-motion animation,
video
Sunday, October 26, 2008
Ethical Issues pertaining to DRM
The governing of society requires laws to clarify the right from the wrong for both businesses and individual members of the society. These laws are made to protect the rights of consumers, individuals, businesses, and anyone else affects.
Shortly after the Olympics ended, China made the news with their milk scandal. Milk powder containing Melamine, a toxic chemical found in plastics and fertilizers, had been the cause of 432 kidney stones in Chinese infants. Milk provides essential nutrients to infants, and poisoning it with Melamine in order to stretch out the baby formula is considered wrong. Prior to Food and Drug Administration laws were in place within the US, thinning out milk had been occurring here too. While this may not be as sever as the addition of Melamine, thinning the milk required infants to consume much more in order to receive the nutrients they need. Having laws in place on a national level AND enforcing them places companies responsible for their own wrong doing.
In John Lewis's book Computer Science Illuminated an article addressing ethical issues and digital rights management (DRM). One controversy addressed within this article illustrated Sony BMG's applying rootkit programs to their products. As defined by Wikipedia, rootkit "is malware which consists of a program designed to take fundamental control of a computer system, without authorization by the system's owners and legitimate managers." One of the primary reasons behind Sony's action had been the increase in pirated materials through Internet exchange (i.e. bit-torrent sites like Napster and Piratebay). Owning a CD or movie provides the owner with rights to that particular copy. However, uploading it to share with others takes away profit from the companies that developed the materials. This had been what Sony was reacting to.
Were the methods they applied as a solution right? No. Just as milk contamination placed infants in danger of death, Sony exposed their consumers to a security hole that could have caused a lot of damage via identity theft, etc. However, companies in ownership of intellectual property should have some governmental forces protecting them. This would require an entity to take charge of the Internet, as it is a nearly governless force. Until this happens many online theft will continue through sites like Piratebay.org.
Shortly after the Olympics ended, China made the news with their milk scandal. Milk powder containing Melamine, a toxic chemical found in plastics and fertilizers, had been the cause of 432 kidney stones in Chinese infants. Milk provides essential nutrients to infants, and poisoning it with Melamine in order to stretch out the baby formula is considered wrong. Prior to Food and Drug Administration laws were in place within the US, thinning out milk had been occurring here too. While this may not be as sever as the addition of Melamine, thinning the milk required infants to consume much more in order to receive the nutrients they need. Having laws in place on a national level AND enforcing them places companies responsible for their own wrong doing.
In John Lewis's book Computer Science Illuminated an article addressing ethical issues and digital rights management (DRM). One controversy addressed within this article illustrated Sony BMG's applying rootkit programs to their products. As defined by Wikipedia, rootkit "is malware which consists of a program designed to take fundamental control of a computer system, without authorization by the system's owners and legitimate managers." One of the primary reasons behind Sony's action had been the increase in pirated materials through Internet exchange (i.e. bit-torrent sites like Napster and Piratebay). Owning a CD or movie provides the owner with rights to that particular copy. However, uploading it to share with others takes away profit from the companies that developed the materials. This had been what Sony was reacting to.
Were the methods they applied as a solution right? No. Just as milk contamination placed infants in danger of death, Sony exposed their consumers to a security hole that could have caused a lot of damage via identity theft, etc. However, companies in ownership of intellectual property should have some governmental forces protecting them. This would require an entity to take charge of the Internet, as it is a nearly governless force. Until this happens many online theft will continue through sites like Piratebay.org.
Sunday, October 12, 2008
Eggplant Pizza
As soon as I have the time, I want to try this Eggplant Pizza. It looks delicious. The recipe may be found at Epicurious, discovered via Google search.
Off to do some grocery shopping. Maybe I'll add some yeast to the list and locate time next weekend. I know I'll be buying some eggplant anyway, but I've been making a single-serving Eggplant Parmesan lately. So good! Usually when I make Eggplant Parmesan its for a mass of people (or a mass of leftover) because its so much food. But I've recently explored the concept of the single serving of this recipe by just taking two slices of eggplant (about 1/2" thick) and spreading seasoning on it and stacking mozzarella, Parmesan, pizza sauce and fresh basil between (and on top of) the two layers. Very good. Quicker cook time and attractive when serving.
Wednesday, October 8, 2008
Sunday, October 5, 2008
Squeak Lab
Working with the program of Squeak over the next two weeks, I would like to try my hand at creating the classic game of Sammy the Snake. For this game, the user must be able to control Sammy with the 4 arrow keys. Sammy must be able to 'grow' when he eats the randomly appearing food. Whenever Sammy eats, the game must be able to keep track of the food eaten via a score board.
To build this game, key sensitive connections need to develop for user control. I forget which function this is, but it will need to connect to the arrows, which each change the direction of Sammy to 0°/90°/180°/270° (up/left/down/right). If Sammy "sees" his color (meaning, if he hits himself) or the wall, than the game is over. So there needs to be scripts that allows for this and a Game Over function. This also means there should be a Start Game script that is activated by any key stroke (or the space bar).
The thing I believe will be most challenging and requiring the need of a TA, will be programming the randomly placed 'food'. I think this will be similar to the function of the pong ball going in a random direction.
Any thoughts and assistance will be much appreciated.
Tuesday, September 23, 2008
Moore's Law
Observed in 1965 by Gordon Moore, co-founder of Intel, Moore predicted that the number of transistors that could be placed on a silicon chip would continue to double at regular intervals for the foreseeable future. His original prediction had been 12 months. First cited in the 35th anniversary's article in Electronics, Moore explains that integrated circuits refers to "all the various technologies which are referred to as microelectronics today as well as any additional ones that result in electronics functions." Examples include but are not limited to: digital cameras, iPods and other sound devices, computers, watches, security systems, et cetera. The primary goal of the article was to explain that as the integrated circuit technology continued to advance, the cost of acquiring the technology would lessen. This Law is still able to be witnessed. For example, every year, the cost of an Apple computer may appear static, but what you get compared to the previous year is more advanced - more RAM, more memory, smaller laptop or bigger monitor, better Intel chip, et cetera.
In 1975, Moore updated the law - as 12 months was no longer a valid prediction - to state that the transistors per square inch on integrated circuits would double every 24 months. In an interview completed by P2P Consortium in 2005 (the 40th anniversary of the Law), Moore states that Intel is actually ahead of the prediction, doubling in a little under 24 months.
As noted above, the originally stated observation of 12 months, slowed to half after 10 years. While 30 years has demonstrated that 24 months serves as a remarkably stable prediction, I believe this too will slow. Moore himself, expect Moore's Law to hold for at least another two decades.
In 1975, Moore updated the law - as 12 months was no longer a valid prediction - to state that the transistors per square inch on integrated circuits would double every 24 months. In an interview completed by P2P Consortium in 2005 (the 40th anniversary of the Law), Moore states that Intel is actually ahead of the prediction, doubling in a little under 24 months.
As noted above, the originally stated observation of 12 months, slowed to half after 10 years. While 30 years has demonstrated that 24 months serves as a remarkably stable prediction, I believe this too will slow. Moore himself, expect Moore's Law to hold for at least another two decades.
Friday, September 19, 2008
International Talk Like A Pirate Day
Today, September 19, is Talk Like a Pirate Day! So have some fun, length those "arrrr"s and act totally ridiculous. See the official site too - talklikeapirate.com.
Thursday, September 18, 2008
What I Want from a Blog
One of the things I want from my own personal blog is the ability to control how it looks and easily update it. When I say that I want to control how it looks, I mean I would like to design it, control the CSS and so forth. None of the free providers really have all of those options for the amount I'm willing to pay at this point, which is zero dollars. One of them, I think it was livejournal, allowed the CSS to be edited, but the user needed a premium account. I didn't like how you couldn't sort out which services were free and which were advanced-user until you've already placed the time into editing the coding. That was annoying.
I am currently at blogger because I have a couple of family members using the service and it is through gmail. I heart google.
I am currently at blogger because I have a couple of family members using the service and it is through gmail. I heart google.
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
Saturday, September 6, 2008
Flash Bunny
Artist Anand Duncan and her super cute animations of bunnies would be an excellent resource in the art room. It showcases works completed for Disney to Cartoon Network, and a diversity of fine art mediums, most particularly quick graphite sketches. What I find most interesting about the site is that Duncan provides the amount of time it took to draw a human model. If shown in the classroom, this would be a good opportunity to talk about how an artist can market themselves and how they show quality of value.
Labels:
art education,
artist,
cartoon style,
illustration
Thursday, September 4, 2008
The Post-it gives birth to the New Identity
I will begin my first posting by acknowledging the Post-it stuck on the upper right corner of my iMac, requesting that I "begin and maintain my first blog". I think its been there for maybe a month or two, and is most likely one of the newer Post-its making similar requests and reminders within the computer region. I've attempted to begin a blog before, however I always stopped my registration when it asked me to pick a name. The decision was too great. I couldn't decide what I wanted to do with the blog, so how could I possibly pick a name? If I just went into default mode and used my common avatar user-name, I would end up with the url skiwana.blogspot.com. If I went for my "U of I alias" the url would be cegolf.blogspot.com. If I wanted to have something more focuses, like on a hobby, I would end up with a url like theartofprocrastination.blogspot.com or oneunitaday.blogspot.com or themidnightoil.blogspot.com. The list could go on and on with the confusion and options available.
Knowing what I wanted to do with the blog was a huge part of my commitment issue with starting a blog. If I want to use it as a journal, then I would need to write consistently and be willing to share my thoughts with the cyberworld – ie. making the private public. Will I be willing to spend the time to compose these thoughts so that they may be interesting to others? Will it help me get over my writer's block if I write about my daily nonsense? Would I get weirded out if people start finding and reading my blog or will I get disappointed if I'm the only one moving the page hit counter?
Today I found my motivation to leap over my fear of committing to a blog name. This motivation was homework from my Informatics 102 course, requiring that I "sign up for a free (blogging) service" and "maintain it for the rest of the semester". Since I will be having to post homework at this address for INFO102, it seems appropriate to use the site as something that can grow from a day-to-day log to whatever it morfs into. Choosing the name Sedezin, which had been the business name I ran under when I did design consulting before returning to grad school, is my first step towards rebranding this identity. My current day-to-day is dedicated to writing papers, teaching, and make art. So my site remains offline and an unused url. Rebranding would allow my to reconsider who I consider my audience to be.
And so I leave this topic to go design a new logo, as new excitement has been born with the birth of this blog.
Knowing what I wanted to do with the blog was a huge part of my commitment issue with starting a blog. If I want to use it as a journal, then I would need to write consistently and be willing to share my thoughts with the cyberworld – ie. making the private public. Will I be willing to spend the time to compose these thoughts so that they may be interesting to others? Will it help me get over my writer's block if I write about my daily nonsense? Would I get weirded out if people start finding and reading my blog or will I get disappointed if I'm the only one moving the page hit counter?
Today I found my motivation to leap over my fear of committing to a blog name. This motivation was homework from my Informatics 102 course, requiring that I "sign up for a free (blogging) service" and "maintain it for the rest of the semester". Since I will be having to post homework at this address for INFO102, it seems appropriate to use the site as something that can grow from a day-to-day log to whatever it morfs into. Choosing the name Sedezin, which had been the business name I ran under when I did design consulting before returning to grad school, is my first step towards rebranding this identity. My current day-to-day is dedicated to writing papers, teaching, and make art. So my site remains offline and an unused url. Rebranding would allow my to reconsider who I consider my audience to be.
And so I leave this topic to go design a new logo, as new excitement has been born with the birth of this blog.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)